"Bleeding Heart" 
seem to lie the origins of the criticism of the theory of evolution in most cases to a general lack of understanding, I will try below to explain the basics in a simple and easy to understand. Too often we hear of atoms that collide randomly and suddenly to form highly complex DNA. Or giraffes are suddenly turned into elephants or whales. Of monkeys, which eventually had no desire to bananas and were more easily to people. Who sets these rates in the world proves that the only thing that the object of his criticism has not understood at the outset. Therefore, now the basics, queries and comments are welcome:
The DNA
Every living thing is defined substantially by a molecule: the DNA, or deoxyribonucleic acid (German: DNA or deoxyribonucleic acid). This is in the form of various base pairs a tremendous amount of information stored, which can be compared with a blueprint of the organism. Every living being has a unique DNA, which is in every body cell and controls the synthesis of various substances.
The DNA double-strand containing the base pairs in the middle of the genetic information
The mutation - the "accident"
At each cell division, DNA is copied, so that it is fully present in both daughter cells. This process is accomplished by enzymes that split the double strand into two single strands at first. Since each of these single strands complementary to the other, is thus almost as a mirror image, it is sufficient to bring both strands of the appropriate base to obtain two new double strands should be exactly the same. If, for copying several hundred million base pairs occur necessarily for errors. Will not eliminate in large part by specialized repair enzymes again, but a few bugs remain so. In addition to these copying errors, there are other factors that may change or mutate DNA. Internal factors such as free radicals, particularly reactive molecules, have just as a mutagenic effect on DNA as well as external influences, such as certain forms of radiation and chemicals. These factors contribute to the DNA of all living things. For creatures like us people who do not multiply by cloning, is added in reproduction is another factor: the DNA of the parents is mixed.
The gene pool
All these influences have the effect that every living being a group in their own unique DNA, has set it apart from all others. And all these different DNA variants in the group of the population, make their so-called gene pool.
The selection
This term describes the much-quoted survival of the fittest. The gradual demise of the individuals and the gradual sorting out of the DNA variants from the gene pool of a population that are not well adapted to their environment, that is the selection. Thus able to survive with limited resources, only the individuals who cope best with their environment. The less well-adapted individuals reproduce on average less often leave because they are such bad food, no dealing with weather conditions and die before the age of reproduction. Or may provide for the poor reproduction of the offspring. In the long term, the population thus consists of better adapted Organisms, the gene pool, which is indeed for the DNA of the entire group is changing.
The genetic drift
Another important mechanism that can change a population, the genetic drift. With each birth, the characteristics of the parents, the alleles, thrown together by chance at a new genome. It may happen that did not inherit certain characteristics. In the longer term or in a small population may, if it happens gradually in all individuals, lead to a feature disappears completely. It is even possible that by sharing some alleles in one part of the group and the disappearance of these features from the other part of the group are two different populations. For larger groups, but this is unlikely. Interestingly, the genetic drift as disasters that will eradicate much of the population. That leaves only a few individuals that may not correspond to the genetic mediocrity of the original group. They and their descendants experienced in such a case a strong change of the gene pool in a very short period of time.
A new species
... is defined as a population that is not genetically compatible with other populations and reproduce only among themselves can. But how can create a completely new species? The two latter factors are responsible. By the unlikely event of a divergence of two groups in a population by genetic drift. Or the occurrence of an event that changed much of the population and therefore extinguishes the most gene variants and thus the gene pool dramatically. The spatial separation of a population in different ecosystems such as the elimination of a land bridge between two islands can produce a new species. The selection shall, in each of the two now separated from each other habitats that survival of the adapted individuals. Are these habitats to survive, the other DNA variants and the gene pools of the two new populations evolve in different directions. Up to a point at which the DNA is different between the two parties so far that a reproduction with the other group is no longer possible ...
First, the video that I found today. This explains a chemist (or a man in a lab coat), what it really means the age of the world, evolution and the Bible itself. In the next episode: we a biologist, why the general theory of relativity gaps ask ... well, not funny. Also, I have a feeling that my sarcasm need later on.
Earth is 6.000 Years Old
00:00
Initially a small review of which is to us to imagine in the dispute opposing scientific camps. Of course, creationism is far from having anything to do with science - on the other side with the guy after all, a lab coat.
From the Bible can be deduced that the earth was created 6,000 years ago by God. Before 4400 years, the great flood took place, may have been born 2000 years ago Jesus. Then the reply, after which the universe some 20 billion years ago had its beginning should have (according to recent research there are less than 14 billion years). The earth is to exist for about four and a half billion years ago and the first life may have occurred before 3 billion years.
far, so good. But even here the excitement fades to a video that at least gives the appearance of respectability. Those who are not before a discussion dealing with the opposite side, they should not begin. describe the big bang as an explosion is a sure indicator of a fundamental lack of understanding of the universe. Reminder: the universe is defined as everything, including space and time. An explosion is a shock wave that propagates in space and time and from a reaction of elements results. The Big Bang also marked the birth of the universe. Going back to time zero, the considered small-minded do not really exist, we find that both matter and space and time for an explosion missing. The Big Bang was simply the beginning of the conditions that make an explosion possible.
1:30
Next in the video. After enumerating the various inhuman long-lived descendants of Adam and showing the timeline of the Bible follows the calculation of the age of all being based on another source, by defining an arbitrary period of time in a generation, it multiplied by the number of generations between Adam and Jesus despite pulled out of the air 50 years per generation, a deviation of nearly 7% to the Bible Version section and check off the whole thing as confirmation.
Now for the scientific world view in which the earth billions of years old. Hangers are the various layers of rock that can be seen in some places of the earth. With the recent shifts in the earth's surface, so it penetrates further into the past, the deeper one goes. Refuted this notion with a crude chart of North America from the air, showing older rock strata in the north, south younger. This provides our chemists as evidence that the dating of rock strata is based on impossible, because the graph, the older layers "on top" maps. Either I have misunderstood something - or here to be happy with the north above equated in the sense of lesser proximity to the center of the earth.
5:30
There they are again, the comparisons. Only the fairy with the magic wand that makes the frog to prince. Then, in direct connection and "even more fantastic," announced the theory of evolution. Here, too, shows again the fundamental ignorance with which the Durchschnittskreationist the object considered his criticism. Of course I would also laugh at each, the me of worms that after a few accidents in fish, after a few more turn into amphibians, then in cats, monkeys, and finally biology professor, says. Who would not? Unfortunately, Mr. Pendleton is on this view also do not like the frequent use of the phrase "by chance" shows. I am almost fascinated by the fact that almost all have Kreationismusverfechter the exact same level of knowledge regarding the evolution. Perhaps this is but only because people with less biological knowledge would never think to publish a video on the subject. And everyone who really understood evolution, no Kreationismusverfechter. Anyway ... in the spirit of the Enlightenment a few facts Evolutionary theory and coincidences:
- the only element of chance in connection with the theory of evolution is the mutation. Mutations are changes in the genome of an organism, in most cases at a disadvantage and lead to death from a certain point, but can sometimes have benefits for the organism. Mutations occur constantly, whether by error in copying the complex DNA molecule by internal factors such as free radicals or external influences such as radiation. Most of the damage is repaired by specific enzymes, a fraction is not.
- merge with the mutation and external events to change the so-called gene pool of a population. If a group of organisms such as an earthquake split into two groups, now about a sunken land bridge may develop no more contact with each other, individuals of the two groups separately in future. The more different the new habitats are, the more the two groups differ over time from one another. Why this is so, explains the ...
- ... selection that has nothing to do with chance and the second pillar of evolution. The selection is the sorting out of living things that are not adapted well enough to their environment. This can be illustrated most easily by an example.
... this will follow the dates, I have to go to bed, good night!
  |
| Here are the instructions for Award: Create a post by you, the beloved Blog posting and image reinkopierst the instructions (= the text you are reading). also you should blog for the person to link has given you the award and they informed by comment on her blog, that you annimst the award and ; I 've done ... her the link of your award leave some posts. then you are thinking about you 3-5 favorite blogs, you also link in your post and the owners of each per comment - function will inform that they have been tagged and here also the link of the post give us is in which the declaration is, okay?. love blogger: The goal of this action is that we unknown , but also good blogs to light , get why I would ask you do not have a blog to post, the already 3,000 readers, but talented beginners and people who blog Although some time, but still not so well known! My big thanks goes out to Claudia - Mumkreativ for this generous "Dearest Blog Award card design for my blog! Very happy I give this "Dearest Blog Award" next to Barbara Blog Mi-Go Kids Art Nate News Speedy -mouncel-and- friends Biggis fabric and wildlife more ... Christiane glassdarkly Sincerely your Barbara |
 |
| soaps of Valentina for me it is a creative and admirable Seifensiederin |
 | |
| and I at "Valentina" I ordered for my feminine love some treasures of soaps for Christmas ... and "relish" they have accepted this noble soaps also happy! wait * gg * |
 | ||
| "May every blessed quiet of his delights! If the rose adorns herself, she also decorates the garden. " Friedrich Rückert | |
