A new blog called "proofs of God ...". Any bet that most people who have discovered this blog have come from an entirely different meaning than what they find here. In particular YouTube, but the one or the other Facebook and forum post has prompted me to write here. First, because the comment functions are very limited, rare for an answer-rich and if they do, this goes down quickly in the flood of new comments. On the other hand, because I can embed videos and the like. There is a comment function, which I will not moderate and will hopefully make for interesting discussions is.
About me . I am a student of natural sciences. If one were to describe myself as an atheist, you would be correct, one would use the word in its original form as a "non believer". Right here a hint: I do not believe in the existence of a god. The bean counters at the theists like to put the "I believe that God does not exist" the same and then comment on the statement with "Aha! Atheists believe so too! "Which not even the definition of" atheist "is fair. Well, back to the point. I am really fascinated by all the natural sciences, even though I, like many other also, for example, mathematics has always been prepared problems. I am talking generally about the fundamental nature of these sciences. The mathematics as the purest of all sciences, incorruptible, not spongy and full of experiments, diluted clear statements. The physics which investigates the basic structure of all being, from the smallest particles with their quantum mechanical ambiguity, to the largest structures in the universe. Next on the chemistry that studies the complex interactions of matter, the biology, which deals specifically with the development and function of living systems, to the highly specialized, often new research directions, all of the above based.
With the theme " faith, God and science " I like to sit apart, as the never-ending debate is influenced in a major part of misunderstandings. For example, the first video here, which gave me just now fully provided the impetus to open the blog. Let's look at the piece of work but at a time.
VOX TV - Science proves God exists - atheists wakes up - Islam is the true religion
Without directly referring to the video we take a cube. We roll the dice and record the number that came out of it. We repeat a hundred times. Then we sit with a scribbled sheet front of the computer and have an order from 100 numbers between 1 6 If you like throwing a dice once, then the probability for the appearance of a certain number of 1 / 6. Roll it twice, it is still only 1 / 36. After three throws, we are at 1 / 216th Finally, after a hundred tosses, the probability for the resulting series of numbers such as 1
653,318,623,500,070,906,096,690,267,158,060,000,000.
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000!
was in retrospect So absurd it unlikely just to roll the series of numbers that we have on our paper.
The probability of rolling a specific number is, 1 / 6
exactly the same way, it is argued, if, as in this video for "Intelligent Design " is about. By and large, is usually on the extreme diversity and would like to drawn attention to the incredibly complex biochemistry within the cell. That it would be unlikely that a bunch of produce Animosäuren without a plan in such complicated structures can, as you see them everywhere today, that excludes the possibility of will be ruled out that such a thing occurs seemingly at random. Very clear: this must be an intelligent designer (let's call him God) have been at work!
happy while the development process of life is left to be ignored. He is the one not yet been clarified completely (and have been Puff, life was suddenly there! It could only God "so often along the lines described above), on the other but research so far that we have the logic's sake, any theory in this regard should take more seriously as an "Oh ... this is complicated ... but I do not understand ... was God".
Did God even in our cube test, the finger in the game? Finally, the probability for exactly this sequence of numbers was so small that one could in principle be equated with zero. This must now decide for themselves ... each
you soon!
0 comments:
Post a Comment